Claim of Ezeckel v. Saperstein
This text of 231 A.D. 771 (Claim of Ezeckel v. Saperstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Award reversed and claim dismissed as against the insurance carrier, with costs against the State Industrial Board, on the ground that by the terms of the policy the accident was not within the risk and location covered by the terms of the policy. (Matter of Pettit v. Reges, 242 N. Y. 272; Matter of Mille v. La Sala Bros., 225 App. Div. 714; Matter of Powers v. Scully, Id. 714.) As against the employer the award is affirmed. Hinman, Acting P. J., Davis and Whitmyer, JJ., concur; Hill, J., dissents and votes for affirmance as against the employer and the insurance carrier; Hasbrouek, J., not voting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
231 A.D. 771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-ezeckel-v-saperstein-nyappdiv-1930.