Claim of Everett v. A. S. Steel Rule Die Corp.
487 N.E.2d 280, 66 N.Y.2d 683, 496 N.Y.S.2d 423, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 17237
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice John T. Casey at the Appellate Division (106 AD2d 181).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Titone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Everett v. A. S. Steel Rule Die Corp., 487 N.E.2d 280, 66 N.Y.2d 683, 496 N.Y.S.2d 423, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 17237 (N.Y. 1985).
487 N.E.2d 280 (Claim of Everett v. A. S. Steel Rule Die Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Demperio v. Onondaga County
126 A.D.3d 1250 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Claim of Hernandez v. Domino Sugar Corp.
245 A.D.2d 680 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
MATTER OF WOOD v. Laidlaw Tr.
565 N.E.2d 1255 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)
Claim of Velazquez v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority
156 A.D.2d 922 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Wood v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.
152 A.D.2d 769 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)