Claim of Estupinan v. Cleanorama Drive-In Cleaners
265 N.E.2d 544, 27 N.Y.2d 867, 317 N.Y.S.2d 21, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1011
This text of 265 N.E.2d 544 (Claim of Estupinan v. Cleanorama Drive-In Cleaners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Claim of Estupinan v. Cleanorama Drive-In Cleaners, 265 N.E.2d 544, 27 N.Y.2d 867, 317 N.Y.S.2d 21, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1011 (N.Y. 1970).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel and Jasen. Taking no part: Judge Gibson.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Claim of Dickinson v. Cape Vincent Volunteer Fire Department
106 A.D.3d 1348 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
265 N.E.2d 544, 27 N.Y.2d 867, 317 N.Y.S.2d 21, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-estupinan-v-cleanorama-drive-in-cleaners-ny-1970.