Claim of Esbin v. Webb & Knapp, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Esbin v. Webb & Knapp, Inc.

17 A.D.2d 1006, 233 N.Y.S.2d 979, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6986

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 21, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 17 A.D.2d 1006 (Claim of Esbin v. Webb & Knapp, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Esbin v. Webb & Knapp, Inc., 17 A.D.2d 1006, 233 N.Y.S.2d 979, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6986 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Claimant has been awarded benefits on the basis of 50% temporary partial disability for the period June 14 to December 1, 1960. Appellants argue that the medical proof does not sustain the finding of disability. There was, however, a prior award to June 14, 1960 based on a 50% disability which appellants did not contest and paid. Part of the medical opinion on which this uncontested award was made, e.g., the report of a physician who noted a “ minimal ” disability on May 5, 1960, which was before the Referee at the time of the award, is urged as a ground for reversing the period now under review. The failure to review that award precludes appellants as to medical facts upon which the June 14 award was made. There is adequate later medical evidence sustaining a continuance of 50% disability for the period here at issue; and in applying to the board for a review of the period considered on this appeal appellants did not raise as an issue the insufficiency of such medical proof (Matter of La Barge v. Mercy Gen. Hosp., 12 A D 2d 689; motion for leave to appeal denied 9 N Y 2d 610; Matter of Sweati v. Fleshman, 14 A D 2d 964, motion for leave to appeal denied 11 N Y 2d 642). After the award of June 14, 1960 claimant entered into a plumbing partnership with his son. He testified that with a single exception he did no actual plumbing work but supervised or solicited for the business. While the physical partial disability continued, therefore, the board upon a proper factual evaluation could find under subdivision 5-a of section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, that claimant had no actual “ earnings ” and fix a wage-earning capacity as a basis for the 50% award. (Matter of Geers v. Oswego Stevedoring & Trucking Co., 2 A D 2d 726; Matter of Moynihan v. Turner Co., 282 App. Div. 974.) Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Claimant has been awarded benefits on the basis of 50% temporary partial disability for the period June 14 to December 1, 1960. Appellants argue that the medical proof does not sustain the finding of disability. There was, however, a prior award to June 14, 1960 based on a 50% disability which appellants did not contest and paid. Part of the medical opinion on which this uncontested award was made, e.g., the report of a physician who noted a “ minimal ” disability on May 5, 1960, which was before the Referee at the time of the award, is urged as a ground for reversing the period now under review. The failure to review that award precludes appellants as to medical facts upon which the June 14 award was made. There is adequate later medical evidence sustaining a continuance of 50% disability for the period here at issue; and in applying to the board for a review of the period considered on this appeal appellants did not raise as an issue the insufficiency of such medical proof (Matter of La Barge v. Mercy Gen. Hosp., 12 A D 2d 689; motion for leave to appeal denied 9 N Y 2d 610; Matter of Sweati v. Fleshman, 14 A D 2d 964, motion for leave to appeal denied 11 N Y 2d 642). After the award of June 14, 1960 claimant entered into a plumbing partnership with his son. He testified that with a single exception he did no actual plumbing work but supervised or solicited for the business. While the physical partial disability continued, therefore, the board upon a proper factual evaluation could find under subdivision 5-a of section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, that claimant had no actual “ earnings ” and fix a wage-earning capacity as a basis for the 50% award. (Matter of Geers v. Oswego Stevedoring & Trucking Co., 2 A D 2d 726; Matter of Moynihan v. Turner Co., 282 App. Div. 974.) Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 A.D.2d 1006, 233 N.Y.S.2d 979, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-esbin-v-webb-knapp-inc-nyappdiv-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack