Claim of Erdberg v. United Textile Print Works, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Erdberg v. United Textile Print Works, Inc.

243 A.D. 658

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 243 A.D. 658 (Claim of Erdberg v. United Textile Print Works, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Erdberg v. United Textile Print Works, Inc., 243 A.D. 658 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

A mother, who has been declared to be a dependent claimant under a claim arising from the death of her son, was awarded compensation. The compensation was paid for a certain length of time, and until she was-eommitted to an insane hospital. The Board held she was not a dependent while in the insane hospital. Upon her parole from the insane hospital, a daughter in whose [659]*659custody claimant was paroled agreed to support her for one year, the agreement being made with the hospital. The daughter’s circumstances changed so that she was unable to carry out her contract. The claimant, mother, again became dependent. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, MeNamee, Crapser and Heffeman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A mother, who has been declared to be a dependent claimant under a claim arising from the death of her son, was awarded compensation. The compensation was paid for a certain length of time, and until she was-eommitted to an insane hospital. The Board held she was not a dependent while in the insane hospital. Upon her parole from the insane hospital, a daughter in whose [659]*659custody claimant was paroled agreed to support her for one year, the agreement being made with the hospital. The daughter’s circumstances changed so that she was unable to carry out her contract. The claimant, mother, again became dependent. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, MeNamee, Crapser and Heffeman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 A.D. 658, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-erdberg-v-united-textile-print-works-inc-nyappdiv-1935.