Claim of Elwood v. Herkimer Central School
232 N.E.2d 646, 20 N.Y.2d 869, 285 N.Y.S.2d 614, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1133
Opinion
Order reversed and determination of the Workmen’s Compensation Board reinstated, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division against respondents employer and carrier, for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in the Appellate Division. No opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Full and Judges Burke, Bergan and Keating. Judges Van Voorhis, Scileppi and Breitel dissent and vote to affirm upon the grounds stated in the concurring opinion of Judge Herlihy in the Appellate Division.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Elwood v. Herkimer Central School, 232 N.E.2d 646, 20 N.Y.2d 869, 285 N.Y.S.2d 614, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1133 (N.Y. 1967).
232 N.E.2d 646 (Claim of Elwood v. Herkimer Central School) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Quality Car Wash v. Cox
438 A.2d 1243 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1981)
Rohrs v. State Accident Insurance Fund
556 P.2d 714 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1976)