Home/New York Court of Appeals/Claim of Elwood v. Herkimer Central School

Claim of Elwood v. Herkimer Central School

232 N.E.2d 646, 20 N.Y.2d 869, 285 N.Y.S.2d 614, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1133
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 2, 1967
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 232 N.E.2d 646 (Claim of Elwood v. Herkimer Central School) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Elwood v. Herkimer Central School, 232 N.E.2d 646, 20 N.Y.2d 869, 285 N.Y.S.2d 614, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1133 (N.Y. 1967).

Opinion

Order reversed and determination of the Workmen’s Compensation Board reinstated, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division against respondents employer and carrier, for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in the Appellate Division. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Full and Judges Burke, Bergan and Keating. Judges Van Voorhis, Scileppi and Breitel dissent and vote to affirm upon the grounds stated in the concurring opinion of Judge Herlihy in the Appellate Division.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Quality Car Wash v. Cox
438 A.2d 1243 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1981)
Rohrs v. State Accident Insurance Fund
556 P.2d 714 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
232 N.E.2d 646, 20 N.Y.2d 869, 285 N.Y.S.2d 614, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-elwood-v-herkimer-central-school-ny-1967.