Claim of Egan v. James A. Hearn & Son

236 A.D. 874

Opinion

— Award reversed, and the claim for medical, nursing and hospital services dismissed, with costs against the State Industrial Board, on the ground that under the undisputed evidence there was no obligation upon the employer to furnish such services. (Workmen’s Comp. Law, § 13; Matter of Koch v. Lehigh Valley R. R. Co., 217 App. Div. 280; affd., 244 N. Y. 578.) Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Rhodes and Crapser, JJ., concur; Hill, J., dissents and votes to affirm upon the ground that the employer failed to provide such hospital service as provided by the statute, and that the doctor furnished by the employer did not give to claimant reasonable and proper treatment, and the employer thereby failed to furnish the medical attendance and treatment mentioned in the statute, and claimant was justified in procuring same.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Egan v. James A. Hearn & Son, 236 A.D. 874 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

236 A.D. 874 (Claim of Egan v. James A. Hearn & Son) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Koch v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company
155 N.E. 904 (New York Court of Appeals, 1927)
Claim of Koch v. Lehigh Valley Railroad
217 A.D. 280 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926)