Claim of Durack v. St. Joachims Church

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Durack v. St. Joachims Church

272 A.D.2d 1091

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 19, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 272 A.D.2d 1091 (Claim of Durack v. St. Joachims Church) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Durack v. St. Joachims Church, 272 A.D.2d 1091 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

This is an appeal from a decision of a referee entered the 16th day of May, 1945, awarding claimant compensation for 20% loss of use of the right leg, and affirmed by the Workmen’s Compensation Board. The board found that the injuries to claimant’s right knee was sustained accidentally and arose out of and in the course of her employment. The board further found that the claimant’s diabetic condition was not causally related, directly or indirectly, to the accident which occurred on November 17,1939. The evidence sustains the finding of the board. Award affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Foster and Russell, JJ., concur; Brewster, J., taking no part. [See post, p. 1096.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an appeal from a decision of a referee entered the 16th day of May, 1945, awarding claimant compensation for 20% loss of use of the right leg, and affirmed by the Workmen’s Compensation Board. The board found that the injuries to claimant’s right knee was sustained accidentally and arose out of and in the course of her employment. The board further found that the claimant’s diabetic condition was not causally related, directly or indirectly, to the accident which occurred on November 17,1939. The evidence sustains the finding of the board. Award affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Foster and Russell, JJ., concur; Brewster, J., taking no part. [See post, p. 1096.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 1091, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-durack-v-st-joachims-church-nyappdiv-1947.