Claim of Dubinsky v. Kofsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Dubinsky v. Kofsky

243 A.D. 647

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 243 A.D. 647 (Claim of Dubinsky v. Kofsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Dubinsky v. Kofsky, 243 A.D. 647 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to be allowed to appeal granted. The court certifies that questions of law have arisen which in its opinion ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals, which questions are hereby certified as follows: 1. Is the decision of the State Industrial Board dismissing the claim supported by the evidence? 2. Did the decedent meet with an accident which arose out of and in the course of the employment? Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, MeNamee, Crapser and Heffeman, JJ. [See 242 App. Div. 342.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to be allowed to appeal granted. The court certifies that questions of law have arisen which in its opinion ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals, which questions are hereby certified as follows: 1. Is the decision of the State Industrial Board dismissing the claim supported by the evidence? 2. Did the decedent meet with an accident which arose out of and in the course of the employment? Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, MeNamee, Crapser and Heffeman, JJ. [See 242 App. Div. 342.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 A.D. 647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-dubinsky-v-kofsky-nyappdiv-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack