Claim of Driver v. Baker, Smith & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Driver v. Baker, Smith & Co.

252 A.D. 717, 298 N.Y.S. 956, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5856

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 29, 1937·Published

Opinion

On May 1, 1936, the claimant herein sustained accidental injuries for which the award was made. The sole question presented to this court for review is whether the wage rate of the claimant, who was a minor at the time of the accident, was properly increased in accordance with section 14, subdivision 5, of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The evidence is sufficient to support the award under the decisions construing this section. (See Szmuda v. Kent Bag Co., 214 App. Div. 341.) Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On May 1, 1936, the claimant herein sustained accidental injuries for which the award was made. The sole question presented to this court for review is whether the wage rate of the claimant, who was a minor at the time of the accident, was properly increased in accordance with section 14, subdivision 5, of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The evidence is sufficient to support the award under the decisions construing this section. (See Szmuda v. Kent Bag Co., 214 App. Div. 341.) Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Claim of Driver v. Baker, Smith & Co., 252 A.D. 717, 298 N.Y.S. 956, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5856 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

252 A.D. 717 (Claim of Driver v. Baker, Smith & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related