Claim of Doherty v. New York Rapid Transit Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Doherty v. New York Rapid Transit Corp.

244 A.D. 853

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1935·Published

Opinion

Claimant was injured August 12, 1926. The injury was to his leg and arm and back, and ankylosis of hip joint. Compensation has been paid for 363 weeks. The appellants claim the award should be confined to schedule losses, and that the award should be limited to ninety per cent loss of use of the arm and leg- plus proper healing period. The evidence shows that there were injuries to other parts of the body besides the arm and leg. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present ■—■ Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claimant was injured August 12, 1926. The injury was to his leg and arm and back, and ankylosis of hip joint. Compensation has been paid for 363 weeks. The appellants claim the award should be confined to schedule losses, and that the award should be limited to ninety per cent loss of use of the arm and leg- plus proper healing period. The evidence shows that there were injuries to other parts of the body besides the arm and leg. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present ■—■ Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Claim of Doherty v. New York Rapid Transit Corp., 244 A.D. 853 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

244 A.D. 853 (Claim of Doherty v. New York Rapid Transit Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.