Claim of Dobbins v. Hatzel & Buehler, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Dobbins v. Hatzel & Buehler, Inc.

243 A.D. 838

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1935·Published

Opinion

The appeal involves the wage rate as fixed under subdivision 2 of section 14 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The corporate employer admitted in its first report of injury that claimant’s wages were the amount adopted by the Board. During the hearings the carrier’s representative in effect consented to the method adopted by the Board in fixing the compensation. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The appeal involves the wage rate as fixed under subdivision 2 of section 14 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The corporate employer admitted in its first report of injury that claimant’s wages were the amount adopted by the Board. During the hearings the carrier’s representative in effect consented to the method adopted by the Board in fixing the compensation. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Claim of Dobbins v. Hatzel & Buehler, Inc., 243 A.D. 838 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

243 A.D. 838 (Claim of Dobbins v. Hatzel & Buehler, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.