Claim of Dobbins v. Hatzel & Buehler, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Dobbins v. Hatzel & Buehler, Inc.

243 A.D. 838

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 243 A.D. 838 (Claim of Dobbins v. Hatzel & Buehler, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Dobbins v. Hatzel & Buehler, Inc., 243 A.D. 838 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

The appeal involves the wage rate as fixed under subdivision 2 of section 14 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The corporate employer admitted in its first report of injury that claimant’s wages were the amount adopted by the Board. During the hearings the carrier’s representative in effect consented to the method adopted by the Board in fixing the compensation. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The appeal involves the wage rate as fixed under subdivision 2 of section 14 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The corporate employer admitted in its first report of injury that claimant’s wages were the amount adopted by the Board. During the hearings the carrier’s representative in effect consented to the method adopted by the Board in fixing the compensation. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 A.D. 838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-dobbins-v-hatzel-buehler-inc-nyappdiv-1935.