Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Claim of Dixon v. Sterling Drugs

Claim of Dixon v. Sterling Drugs

96 A.D.2d 634, 464 N.Y.S.2d 860, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19186
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 14, 1983
StatusPublished

This text of 96 A.D.2d 634 (Claim of Dixon v. Sterling Drugs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Dixon v. Sterling Drugs, 96 A.D.2d 634, 464 N.Y.S.2d 860, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19186 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

— Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed July 8,1982, which held that claimant suffered a causally related myocardial infarction on January 11,1979. The board found: “[Bjased upon testimony of Dr. B. J. Davis, that the claimant had a myocardial infarction arising out of his strenuous work activities of January 11, 1979.” There is substantial evidence to sustain the determination of the board (see Matter of Monette v County of Albany, 96 AD2d 633). Decision affirmed, with one bill of costs to respondents filing briefs. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Main, Casey and Weiss, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claim of Monette v. County of Albany
96 A.D.2d 633 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 A.D.2d 634, 464 N.Y.S.2d 860, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-dixon-v-sterling-drugs-nyappdiv-1983.