Claim of Dixon v. Sterling Drugs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Dixon v. Sterling Drugs

96 A.D.2d 634, 464 N.Y.S.2d 860, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19186

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 14, 1983·Published

Opinion

— Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed July 8,1982, which held that claimant suffered a causally related myocardial infarction on January 11,1979. The board found: “[Bjased upon testimony of Dr. B. J. Davis, that the claimant had a myocardial infarction arising out of his strenuous work activities of January 11, 1979.” There is substantial evidence to sustain the determination of the board (see Matter of Monette v County of Albany, 96 AD2d 633). Decision affirmed, with one bill of costs to respondents filing briefs. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Main, Casey and Weiss, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed July 8,1982, which held that claimant suffered a causally related myocardial infarction on January 11,1979. The board found: “[Bjased upon testimony of Dr. B. J. Davis, that the claimant had a myocardial infarction arising out of his strenuous work activities of January 11, 1979.” There is substantial evidence to sustain the determination of the board (see Matter of Monette v County of Albany, 96 AD2d 633). Decision affirmed, with one bill of costs to respondents filing briefs. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Main, Casey and Weiss, JJ., concur.

Claim of Dixon v. Sterling Drugs, 96 A.D.2d 634, 464 N.Y.S.2d 860, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19186 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

96 A.D.2d 634 (Claim of Dixon v. Sterling Drugs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related