Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Claim of Dienske v. Tompkins

Claim of Dienske v. Tompkins

255 A.D. 735, 6 N.Y.S.2d 757, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4953
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 21, 1938
StatusPublished

This text of 255 A.D. 735 (Claim of Dienske v. Tompkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Dienske v. Tompkins, 255 A.D. 735, 6 N.Y.S.2d 757, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4953 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

Appeal by employer and insurance carrier from an award of the State Industrial Board in claimant's favor. The Board found that on August 16, 1936, while claimant was engaged in Ms regular occupation, and while proceeding to attend the hot water heater, he fell and sustained injuries and resultant disability for wMeh the award is made. The evidence sustains the findings. Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. HUI, P. J., Crapser, Bliss and Heffeman, JJ., concur; Bhodes, J., dissents on the authority of Matter of Pisko v. Mintz (262 N. Y. 176).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Pisko v. Mintz
186 N.E. 434 (New York Court of Appeals, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
255 A.D. 735, 6 N.Y.S.2d 757, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-dienske-v-tompkins-nyappdiv-1938.