Claim of Diaz v. Plaza Hotel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Diaz v. Plaza Hotel

79 A.D.2d 804, 435 N.Y.S.2d 102, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14213

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 24, 1980

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 79 A.D.2d 804 (Claim of Diaz v. Plaza Hotel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Diaz v. Plaza Hotel, 79 A.D.2d 804, 435 N.Y.S.2d 102, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14213 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed September 25, 1979. Claimant, a 52-year-old painter, suffered an injury to his left foot on April 14, 1978, when he fell as he left his place of employment at the Plaza Hotel at the conclusion of his work. The situs of claimant’s fall while ascending the stairway from the underground of the employer’s leased premises to the street level was within the geographical area necessarily provided by and required by the employer for use by its employees. This stairway was used by the Plaza’s employees as the sole method of ingress and egress to the street level. No alternate route to or from the street level was provided for its employees. Claimant walked about 8 to 10 feet from the exit and was on the second step of steps leading out of the building when he fell. The board found “that the employee’s entrance to the Plaza Hotel is at the bottom of the subway steps, and was the entrance used by them to enter and leave the hotel. The claimant is entitled to safe ingress and egress from his place of employment, and claimant’s accident arose out of and in the course of employment.” Substantial evidence supports the board’s decision. (Cf. Matter of Neely v. G. W. Morrison, Inc., 79 AD2d 803.) Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workers’ Compensation Board. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Main, Mikoll and Casey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed September 25, 1979. Claimant, a 52-year-old painter, suffered an injury to his left foot on April 14, 1978, when he fell as he left his place of employment at the Plaza Hotel at the conclusion of his work. The situs of claimant’s fall while ascending the stairway from the underground of the employer’s leased premises to the street level was within the geographical area necessarily provided by and required by the employer for use by its employees. This stairway was used by the Plaza’s employees as the sole method of ingress and egress to the street level. No alternate route to or from the street level was provided for its employees. Claimant walked about 8 to 10 feet from the exit and was on the second step of steps leading out of the building when he fell. The board found “that the employee’s entrance to the Plaza Hotel is at the bottom of the subway steps, and was the entrance used by them to enter and leave the hotel. The claimant is entitled to safe ingress and egress from his place of employment, and claimant’s accident arose out of and in the course of employment.” Substantial evidence supports the board’s decision. (Cf. Matter of Neely v. G. W. Morrison, Inc., 79 AD2d 803.) Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workers’ Compensation Board. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Main, Mikoll and Casey, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

79 A.D.2d 804, 435 N.Y.S.2d 102, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-diaz-v-plaza-hotel-nyappdiv-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack