Claim of Di Salvo v. Master Waterproofing & Roofing Corp.
262 A.D. 919, 28 N.Y.S.2d 878, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6470
Opinion
Motion for leave to prosecute appeal on typewritten record denied, without costs, because the papers show that only questions of fact are involved which we have no jurisdiction to review. Present — Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffernan, Schenek and Foster, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Di Salvo v. Master Waterproofing & Roofing Corp., 262 A.D. 919, 28 N.Y.S.2d 878, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6470 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).
262 A.D. 919 (Claim of Di Salvo v. Master Waterproofing & Roofing Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.