Claim of Di Amore v. Ninth Federal & Savings Loan Ass'n
195 N.E.2d 309, 13 N.Y.2d 1025
This text of 195 N.E.2d 309 (Claim of Di Amore v. Ninth Federal & Savings Loan Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Claim of Di Amore v. Ninth Federal & Savings Loan Ass'n, 195 N.E.2d 309, 13 N.Y.2d 1025 (N.Y. 1963).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen’s Compensation Board; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Burke, Foster and Scileppi. Judge Van Voorhis dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the claim upon the ground that there is no substantial evidence that decedent’s heart attack was caused by his employment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
195 N.E.2d 309, 13 N.Y.2d 1025, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-di-amore-v-ninth-federal-savings-loan-assn-ny-1963.