Claim of Dewitt v. John C. Hoornbeek's Sons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Dewitt v. John C. Hoornbeek's Sons

248 A.D. 647

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D. 647 (Claim of Dewitt v. John C. Hoornbeek's Sons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Dewitt v. John C. Hoornbeek's Sons, 248 A.D. 647 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the claimant from an award made by the State Industrial Board of ninety per cent loss of the use of the left leg, and forty per cent loss of the use of the left arm, as schedule awards, on the ground that additional non-schedule injuries were sustained, and that the award should have been made under paragraph v of the third subdivision of section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Claimant fed about twenty feet from a plank crossing a mill stream to the ice below, and was carried down stream by the ice and current about fifty feet. He received many injuries, including very serious ones to his leg and arm. The Board found as a fact that one of the additional injuries was that to his shoulder, but no award therefor was made, and refused to find or to make any award for any injuries except those to the leg and arm. The consideration of facial injuries was postponed to a later hearing. The evidence justifies not only the finding made relative to the shoulder, but also justifies finding of injury to the hip. The accident occurred March 4, 1926. At that time the present paragraph u of said section had not been adopted, and accordingly multiple awards were not authorized. And even now paragraph u may not be applied to injuries sustained in 1926, as that provision is not retroactive. (Matter of Knights v. Morris, 265 N. Y. 527.) Thus the award to be made here must be made without regard to the amendment of 1929. The claimant having sustained multiple injuries of the schedule class, as well as non-schedule injuries, any award to be made in this ease must be made under paragraph v of subdivision 3 of section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Award reversed, with costs to the claimant against the employer and the insurance carrier, and matter remitted to the Industrial Board for an award under paragraph v of subdivision 3 of section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the claimant from an award made by the State Industrial Board of ninety per cent loss of the use of the left leg, and forty per cent loss of the use of the left arm, as schedule awards, on the ground that additional non-schedule injuries were sustained, and that the award should have been made under paragraph v of the third subdivision of section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Claimant fed about twenty feet from a plank crossing a mill stream to the ice below, and was carried down stream by the ice and current about fifty feet. He received many injuries, including very serious ones to his leg and arm. The Board found as a fact that one of the additional injuries was that to his shoulder, but no award therefor was made, and refused to find or to make any award for any injuries except those to the leg and arm. The consideration of facial injuries was postponed to a later hearing. The evidence justifies not only the finding made relative to the shoulder, but also justifies finding of injury to the hip. The accident occurred March 4, 1926. At that time the present paragraph u of said section had not been adopted, and accordingly multiple awards were not authorized. And even now paragraph u may not be applied to injuries sustained in 1926, as that provision is not retroactive. (Matter of Knights v. Morris, 265 N. Y. 527.) Thus the award to be made here must be made without regard to the amendment of 1929. The claimant having sustained multiple injuries of the schedule class, as well as non-schedule injuries, any award to be made in this ease must be made under paragraph v of subdivision 3 of section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Award reversed, with costs to the claimant against the employer and the insurance carrier, and matter remitted to the Industrial Board for an award under paragraph v of subdivision 3 of section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D. 647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-dewitt-v-john-c-hoornbeeks-sons-nyappdiv-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack