Claim of Deas v. New York City Housing Authority

549 N.E.2d 148, 74 N.Y.2d 914, 549 N.Y.S.2d 957, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 3218
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 21, 1989
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 549 N.E.2d 148 (Claim of Deas v. New York City Housing Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Deas v. New York City Housing Authority, 549 N.E.2d 148, 74 N.Y.2d 914, 549 N.Y.S.2d 957, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 3218 (N.Y. 1989).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board reinstated.

Workers’ Compensation Law § 25 (3) (c) (since amended with minor changes and renumbered as Workers’ Compensation Law § 25 [3] [d]) provides that an employer or insurer that fails to make timely payment of a workers’ compensation award must pay a penalty "to the injured worker or his or her dependents.” A penalty was assessed against respondent State Insurance Fund for not timely reimbursing the Housing Authority even though the employer paid claimant’s full wages pending determination and reimbursement of the award. The State Insurance Fund expressly conceded on the record an obligation to pay the penalty but argued it should be paid to the employer Housing Authority.

In view of the concession, we need not pass on whether the penalty provision is implicated at all, for if it is, the payment by the statute’s plain command must go to the claimant (see, Workers’ Compensation Law § 25 [3] [c]).

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur in memorandum.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claim of Keser v. New York State Elmira Psychiatric Center
699 N.E.2d 411 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
In re the Claim of Keser v. New York State Elmira Psychiatric Center
243 A.D.2d 783 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Hamilton v. Purser
162 A.D.2d 91 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
De Mayo v. Rensselaer Polytech Institute
547 N.E.2d 1157 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
549 N.E.2d 148, 74 N.Y.2d 914, 549 N.Y.S.2d 957, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 3218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-deas-v-new-york-city-housing-authority-ny-1989.