Claim of De Rose v. Stento

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of De Rose v. Stento

228 A.D. 867

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 228 A.D. 867 (Claim of De Rose v. Stento) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of De Rose v. Stento, 228 A.D. 867 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal dismissed, without costs, on the ground that the insurance carrier has appealed for itself alone on an issue hostile to the interests of the employer, without either directing the notice of appeal to the employer or serving the same upon the employer. The appeal is dismissed, however, without prejudice to the right of appellant to make application to perfect the appeal, pursuant to section 107 of the Civil Practice Act. Present •— Hinman, Acting P. J., Davis, Whitmyer, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal dismissed, without costs, on the ground that the insurance carrier has appealed for itself alone on an issue hostile to the interests of the employer, without either directing the notice of appeal to the employer or serving the same upon the employer. The appeal is dismissed, however, without prejudice to the right of appellant to make application to perfect the appeal, pursuant to section 107 of the Civil Practice Act. Present •— Hinman, Acting P. J., Davis, Whitmyer, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

228 A.D. 867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-de-rose-v-stento-nyappdiv-1930.