Claim of De Francesco v. Singer Sewing Machine Co.
This text of 232 A.D. 861 (Claim of De Francesco v. Singer Sewing Machine Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Award reversed and claim remitted, with costs against the State Industrial Board to abide the event, on the ground that the action of the referee in excluding testimony of witnesses was prejudicial to the rights of the appellant. All concur, except Whitmyer and Hill, JJ-, who dissent and vote to affirm award on the ground that no definite offer to call the witnesses was made.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
232 A.D. 861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-de-francesco-v-singer-sewing-machine-co-nyappdiv-1931.