Claim of De Angelis v. Garfinkel Painting Co.

220 N.E.2d 810, 18 N.Y.2d 727, 274 N.Y.S.2d 167, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1101
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 29, 1966
StatusPublished

This text of 220 N.E.2d 810 (Claim of De Angelis v. Garfinkel Painting Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of De Angelis v. Garfinkel Painting Co., 220 N.E.2d 810, 18 N.Y.2d 727, 274 N.Y.S.2d 167, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1101 (N.Y. 1966).

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs to claimant-respondent Workmen’s Compensation Board; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Van Voobhis, Btjbke, Scileppi and Keating. Taking no part: Judge Bebgan.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
220 N.E.2d 810, 18 N.Y.2d 727, 274 N.Y.S.2d 167, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-de-angelis-v-garfinkel-painting-co-ny-1966.