Claim of Davis v. Dexter Folder Co.

281 A.D. 721, 118 N.Y.S.2d 139, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3347
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 30, 1952
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 281 A.D. 721 (Claim of Davis v. Dexter Folder Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Davis v. Dexter Folder Co., 281 A.D. 721, 118 N.Y.S.2d 139, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3347 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

Opinion

Appeal by an employer and its insurance carrier from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board that claimant was disabled as the result of an occupational disease. The board fixed the date of disability as of March 3, 1951. Appellants’ chief contention is that the finding of disability as of March 3, 1951, is arbitrary and without substantial evidence to sustain it. Section 42 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law provides that the date of disablement in occupational disease cases is to be fixed by the board. Of course this does not give the board power to fix a date arbitrarily, but if a fair issue of fact is raised the decision of the board is final. Claimant had a long hernia history on his left side, and finally on March 3, 1951, a physician noted a hernia on his right side. While this latter hernia apparently had existed for some time there is no evidence, medical or otherwise, that it had actually disabled him prior to that date. The report of the physician who examined claimant on the 3d of March, 1951, indicated that claimant found it difficult to continue work because of pains in both groins. It also requested authorization for a bilateral operation. There is evidence, therefore, of a substantial nature to sustain the board’s finding of disability as of the date of such report. With that date properly fixed appellants’ claim was filed within the statutory period. Because claimant was actually working at the time his claim was not vitiated (Matter of Yuras v. Union Table & Spring Co., 279 App. Div. 679). Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Foster, P. J., Brewster, Bergan and Halpern, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Claim of Russell v. Union Forging Co.
30 A.D.2d 713 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1968)
Claim of Muniak v. ACF Industries, Inc.
7 A.D.2d 258 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
Claim of Reisinger v. Liebmann Breweries, Inc.
7 A.D.2d 658 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)
Adams v. Rev. Bd. Ind. Emp. SEC. Div.
143 N.E.2d 564 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1957)
Claim of Cole v. Saranac Lake General Hospital
282 A.D. 626 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
281 A.D. 721, 118 N.Y.S.2d 139, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-davis-v-dexter-folder-co-nyappdiv-1952.