Claim of Daly v. Board of Elections

254 A.D. 914, 5 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8282
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 22, 1938·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal from an award of the State Industrial Board of compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Claimant was an employee in the office of the board of elections of the city of New York. The sole question is whether he was an employee of the State within the contemplation of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, the benefits of which are extended to “ any employment by the State.” (Workmen’s Comp. Law, § 3, subd. 1, group 16.) The board of elections of the city of New York is a State agency. (,Matter of Reynolds, 202 N. Y. 430, 441; Schieffelin v. Komfort, 212 id. 520.) Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ., concur; Rhodes, J., dissents and votes to reverse the award and to dismiss the claim, on the ground that the claimant is not a State employee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Daly v. Board of Elections, 254 A.D. 914, 5 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8282 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

254 A.D. 914 (Claim of Daly v. Board of Elections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Chilk v. City of New York
26 A.D.2d 425 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1966)
Schauf v. City of New York
23 Misc. 2d 585 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
Shea v. Falk
19 Misc. 2d 747 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)