Claim of Curry v. Prudence Bonds Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Curry v. Prudence Bonds Corp.

264 A.D. 798, 34 N.Y.S.2d 670, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4776

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 6, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 264 A.D. 798 (Claim of Curry v. Prudence Bonds Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Curry v. Prudence Bonds Corp., 264 A.D. 798, 34 N.Y.S.2d 670, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4776 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an award of disability benefits made by the State Industrial Board under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Claimant was struck on the head by a furnace poker on November 30, 1938. On April 8, 1939, he suffered a seizure and was taken to the Kings County Hospital where his condition was ultimately diagnosed as traumatic psychosis of the traumatic personality disorder type. The contention of the appellant is that there was no causal relation between his mental condition and the accident. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffeman and Foster,' JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an award of disability benefits made by the State Industrial Board under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Claimant was struck on the head by a furnace poker on November 30, 1938. On April 8, 1939, he suffered a seizure and was taken to the Kings County Hospital where his condition was ultimately diagnosed as traumatic psychosis of the traumatic personality disorder type. The contention of the appellant is that there was no causal relation between his mental condition and the accident. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffeman and Foster,' JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 A.D. 798, 34 N.Y.S.2d 670, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-curry-v-prudence-bonds-corp-nyappdiv-1942.