Claim of Crutshank v. Gypsum Deck Associates, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Crutshank v. Gypsum Deck Associates, Inc.

37 A.D.2d 889, 325 N.Y.S.2d 315, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3178

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 27, 1971

StatusPublished

This text of 37 A.D.2d 889 (Claim of Crutshank v. Gypsum Deck Associates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Crutshank v. Gypsum Deck Associates, Inc., 37 A.D.2d 889, 325 N.Y.S.2d 315, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3178 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the employer and its insurance carrier from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed November 30, 1970, awarding death benefits to the claimant. The board found: “ That decedent was an outside worker, he had wide latitude in performing his work, the automobile was supplied by the employer and the upkeep of the ear was paid for by the employer. Furthermore there is no conclusive evidence that there had been a deviation from employment. On the morning of the accident it had been snowing, the roads were slippery and the accident occurred on a curve in the road which made driving hazardous. The board further finds that the accident arose out of and in the course of the employment and was not due solely to intoxication.” “ Where the reasonable inference from the evidence is that an unwitnessed accident occurred in the course of decedent’s employment, the presumption is that it arose out of the employment” (Matter of Quigley v. American Motor Sales Corp., 36 A D 2d 668). The record does not contain evidence which would conclusively indicate that the accident was caused by alcoholic intoxication. (See Matter of Post v. Tennessee Prods. & Chem. Corp., 19 A D 2d 484, affd. 14 N Y 2d 796; Matter of Quigley v. American Motor Sales Corp., supra; Matter of Dunn v. Supervised Investors Servs., 34 A D 2d 1067, 1068, mot. for lv. to app. den. 27 N Y 2d 485.) Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Greenblott, Sweeney and Simons, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the employer and its insurance carrier from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed November 30, 1970, awarding death benefits to the claimant. The board found: “ That decedent was an outside worker, he had wide latitude in performing his work, the automobile was supplied by the employer and the upkeep of the ear was paid for by the employer. Furthermore there is no conclusive evidence that there had been a deviation from employment. On the morning of the accident it had been snowing, the roads were slippery and the accident occurred on a curve in the road which made driving hazardous. The board further finds that the accident arose out of and in the course of the employment and was not due solely to intoxication.” “ Where the reasonable inference from the evidence is that an unwitnessed accident occurred in the course of decedent’s employment, the presumption is that it arose out of the employment” (Matter of Quigley v. American Motor Sales Corp., 36 A D 2d 668). The record does not contain evidence which would conclusively indicate that the accident was caused by alcoholic intoxication. (See Matter of Post v. Tennessee Prods. & Chem. Corp., 19 A D 2d 484, affd. 14 N Y 2d 796; Matter of Quigley v. American Motor Sales Corp., supra; Matter of Dunn v. Supervised Investors Servs., 34 A D 2d 1067, 1068, mot. for lv. to app. den. 27 N Y 2d 485.) Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Greenblott, Sweeney and Simons, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 A.D.2d 889, 325 N.Y.S.2d 315, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-crutshank-v-gypsum-deck-associates-inc-nyappdiv-1971.