Claim of Crumpacker v. Batavia Times Publishing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Crumpacker v. Batavia Times Publishing Co.

264 A.D. 968, 37 N.Y.S.2d 216, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5573

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 23, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 264 A.D. 968 (Claim of Crumpacker v. Batavia Times Publishing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Crumpacker v. Batavia Times Publishing Co., 264 A.D. 968, 37 N.Y.S.2d 216, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5573 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision denying claimant’s claim for compensation. While alighting from an automobile parked in front of her home she fell and sustained injuries. Her employer was engaged in the newspaper and law printing businesss, and she was employed as a saleslady and outside employee, soliciting orders for the printing of records and briefs. She claimed that on the occasion in question she had prospective customers with her and was to show samples in her home to them. The referee and the State Industrial Board rejected this story and found that she was merely being taken home from her office by one of her friends and was not engaged in her employment at the time. Only a question of fact is presented. Decision affirmed, without costs. Crapser, Heffernan, Sehenck and Foster, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision denying claimant’s claim for compensation. While alighting from an automobile parked in front of her home she fell and sustained injuries. Her employer was engaged in the newspaper and law printing businesss, and she was employed as a saleslady and outside employee, soliciting orders for the printing of records and briefs. She claimed that on the occasion in question she had prospective customers with her and was to show samples in her home to them. The referee and the State Industrial Board rejected this story and found that she was merely being taken home from her office by one of her friends and was not engaged in her employment at the time. Only a question of fact is presented. Decision affirmed, without costs. Crapser, Heffernan, Sehenck and Foster, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 A.D. 968, 37 N.Y.S.2d 216, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-crumpacker-v-batavia-times-publishing-co-nyappdiv-1942.