Claim of County of Oneida v. Bartholomew
46 N.E. 1151, 151 N.Y. 655, 1897 N.Y. LEXIS 886
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur, except O’Bbien, J., absent, and Mabtin, J., not sitting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of County of Oneida v. Bartholomew, 46 N.E. 1151, 151 N.Y. 655, 1897 N.Y. LEXIS 886 (N.Y. 1897).
46 N.E. 1151 (Claim of County of Oneida v. Bartholomew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Estate of Hessney
177 Misc. 781 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1941)