Claim of Core v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Core v. New York City Transit Authority

26 A.D.2d 781, 273 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3449

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 29, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 26 A.D.2d 781 (Claim of Core v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Core v. New York City Transit Authority, 26 A.D.2d 781, 273 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3449 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, entered February 28, 1966, granting claimant’s motion for leave to file a late notice of claim, unanimously reversed on the law and on the facts, with $30 costs and disbursements to appellant and motion denied. Under the circumstances of this case the court was without power to extend the period for service of a notice of claim. The excuse offered does not come within any of the exceptions of the statute. (General Municipal Law, § 50-e, subd. 1; § 50-e, subd. 5; see Matter of Bloom v. New York, City Tr. Auth., 19 A D 2d 521, revg. 31 Misc 2d 805; Matter of White v. City of New York, 285 App. Div. 69.) Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Steuer and Capozzoli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, entered February 28, 1966, granting claimant’s motion for leave to file a late notice of claim, unanimously reversed on the law and on the facts, with $30 costs and disbursements to appellant and motion denied. Under the circumstances of this case the court was without power to extend the period for service of a notice of claim. The excuse offered does not come within any of the exceptions of the statute. (General Municipal Law, § 50-e, subd. 1; § 50-e, subd. 5; see Matter of Bloom v. New York, City Tr. Auth., 19 A D 2d 521, revg. 31 Misc 2d 805; Matter of White v. City of New York, 285 App. Div. 69.) Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Steuer and Capozzoli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.2d 781, 273 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-core-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-nyappdiv-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack