Claim of Constanza v. Continental Undergarment Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Constanza v. Continental Undergarment Co.

264 A.D. 970, 37 N.Y.S.2d 172, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5581

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 23, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 264 A.D. 970 (Claim of Constanza v. Continental Undergarment Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Constanza v. Continental Undergarment Co., 264 A.D. 970, 37 N.Y.S.2d 172, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5581 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

The employer and its insurance carrier have appealed from an award of the State Industrial Board for disability compensation in favor of claimant. It is conceded that while engaged in a regular employment claimant became disabled as a result of an occupational disease due to the nature of her employment. The only question raised by the appellants is that claimant failed to give notice of disablement. The State Industrial Board found that such notice was given. The evidence sustains the finding. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Heffernan, Sehenck and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The employer and its insurance carrier have appealed from an award of the State Industrial Board for disability compensation in favor of claimant. It is conceded that while engaged in a regular employment claimant became disabled as a result of an occupational disease due to the nature of her employment. The only question raised by the appellants is that claimant failed to give notice of disablement. The State Industrial Board found that such notice was given. The evidence sustains the finding. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Heffernan, Sehenck and Foster, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 A.D. 970, 37 N.Y.S.2d 172, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-constanza-v-continental-undergarment-co-nyappdiv-1942.