Claim of Collins v. Fonda, Johnstown & Gloversville Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Collins v. Fonda, Johnstown & Gloversville Railroad

224 A.D. 793

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 15, 1928

StatusPublished

This text of 224 A.D. 793 (Claim of Collins v. Fonda, Johnstown & Gloversville Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Collins v. Fonda, Johnstown & Gloversville Railroad, 224 A.D. 793 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There is no dispute in the facts that this appellant is engaged in interstate commerce. While the railroad physically is wholly within the boundaries of this State it has track connections with the New York Central railroad at Fonda. At that point there is an interchange of passenger traffic and freight shipments. All the trains passing over the railroad carry freight and at least one-half of the amount handled is of interstate character. The affairs of the railroad company are regulated by the Interstate Commerce Commission. It has been legally determined that this corporation is an interstate carrier. (Board of Hudson R. Reg. Dist. v. F., J. & G. R. R. Co., 127 Misc. 866; 223 App. Div. 358.) The claimant was injured while engaged in work on the roadbed. This work was indispensable to the interstate commerce being carried on by the corporation and was a part of it. (Pedersen v. D., L. & W. R. R. Co., 229 U. S. 146; New York Central R. R. Co. v. Porter, 249 id. 168.) The fact that the tracks and railroad property were entirely within the State of New York does not affect its status as an interstate carrier if in fact it engages in interstate commerce. (Caldine v. Unadilla Valley R. Co., 246 N. Y. 365.) This ease differs fundamentally from those where mixed questions of law and fact are presented and the conclusion reached depends upon the object and purpose of the work. (See Matter of Plass v. Central New England R. Co., 226 N. Y. 449; Matter of Otterstedt v. Lehigh & Hudson River R. Co., 234 id. 203; Matter of Leslie v. Long Island R. R. Co., 222 App. Div. 702; affd., 248 N. Y. 511.) The award should be reversed and the claim dismissed, with costs against the State Industrial Board. Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Davis, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur. Award reversed and claim dismissed, with costs against the State Industrial Board.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

There is no dispute in the facts that this appellant is engaged in interstate commerce. While the railroad physically is wholly within the boundaries of this State it has track connections with the New York Central railroad at Fonda. At that point there is an interchange of passenger traffic and freight shipments. All the trains passing over the railroad carry freight and at least one-half of the amount handled is of interstate character. The affairs of the railroad company are regulated by the Interstate Commerce Commission. It has been legally determined that this corporation is an interstate carrier. (Board of Hudson R. Reg. Dist. v. F., J. & G. R. R. Co., 127 Misc. 866; 223 App. Div. 358.) The claimant was injured while engaged in work on the roadbed. This work was indispensable to the interstate commerce being carried on by the corporation and was a part of it. (Pedersen v. D., L. & W. R. R. Co., 229 U. S. 146; New York Central R. R. Co. v. Porter, 249 id. 168.) The fact that the tracks and railroad property were entirely within the State of New York does not affect its status as an interstate carrier if in fact it engages in interstate commerce. (Caldine v. Unadilla Valley R. Co., 246 N. Y. 365.) This ease differs fundamentally from those where mixed questions of law and fact are presented and the conclusion reached depends upon the object and purpose of the work. (See Matter of Plass v. Central New England R. Co., 226 N. Y. 449; Matter of Otterstedt v. Lehigh & Hudson River R. Co., 234 id. 203; Matter of Leslie v. Long Island R. R. Co., 222 App. Div. 702; affd., 248 N. Y. 511.) The award should be reversed and the claim dismissed, with costs against the State Industrial Board. Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Davis, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur. Award reversed and claim dismissed, with costs against the State Industrial Board.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

224 A.D. 793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-collins-v-fonda-johnstown-gloversville-railroad-nyappdiv-1928.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack