Claim of Collier v. Brightwater Beer & Soda Distributor
554 N.E.2d 1278, 75 N.Y.2d 949, 555 N.Y.S.2d 690, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 930
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (147 AD2d 868; see also, Matter of De Mayo v Rensselaer Polytech Inst., 74 NY2d 459).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacos a.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Collier v. Brightwater Beer & Soda Distributor, 554 N.E.2d 1278, 75 N.Y.2d 949, 555 N.Y.S.2d 690, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 930 (N.Y. 1990).
554 N.E.2d 1278 (Claim of Collier v. Brightwater Beer & Soda Distributor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hernandez v. Excel Recycling Corp.
31 A.D.3d 1091 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Moynihan v. Moyers Corners Fire Department, Inc.
254 A.D.2d 584 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)