Claim of Clayton v. Walker-Hayes
219 A.D. 848
Opinion
Award reversed and claim remitted, with costs against the State Industrial Board to abide the event, on the ground that an improper basis and method have been employed in fixing claimant’s wage rate; it should be determined under subdivisions 2 and 4 of section 14 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. (Mackin v. Press Publishing Co., 209 App. Div. 252.) Van Kirk, Acting P. J., Hinman, McCann Davis and Whitmyer, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Clayton v. Walker-Hayes, 219 A.D. 848 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).
219 A.D. 848 (Claim of Clayton v. Walker-Hayes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mackin v. Press Publishing Co.
209 A.D. 252 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924)