Claim of Clarke v. Shell Union Oil Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Clarke v. Shell Union Oil Corp.

254 A.D. 610, 2 N.Y.S.2d 915

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 16, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 254 A.D. 610 (Claim of Clarke v. Shell Union Oil Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Clarke v. Shell Union Oil Corp., 254 A.D. 610, 2 N.Y.S.2d 915 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the State Industrial Board which determined that claimant sustained accidental injuries arising out of and in the course of his employment. He and a fellow [611]*611employee, George N. Natole, were employed as salesmen in the business of selling gasoline and oil. While in the course of his employment, riding in a car belonging to the employer and operated by Natole, en route to his home, the car left the road, as a result of which claimant sustained the injuries in question. The referee found that although claimant had been disabled there has been no loss of wages and the case was continued. The only question raised by appellants is that the injuries did not arise out of and in the course of employment. Decision unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ. [See next case.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the State Industrial Board which determined that claimant sustained accidental injuries arising out of and in the course of his employment. He and a fellow [611]*611employee, George N. Natole, were employed as salesmen in the business of selling gasoline and oil. While in the course of his employment, riding in a car belonging to the employer and operated by Natole, en route to his home, the car left the road, as a result of which claimant sustained the injuries in question. The referee found that although claimant had been disabled there has been no loss of wages and the case was continued. The only question raised by appellants is that the injuries did not arise out of and in the course of employment. Decision unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ. [See next case.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D. 610, 2 N.Y.S.2d 915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-clarke-v-shell-union-oil-corp-nyappdiv-1938.