Claim of Clark v. Clarkstown Police Department

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Clark v. Clarkstown Police Department

201 A.D.2d 824, 607 N.Y.S.2d 491, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1129

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 10, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 201 A.D.2d 824 (Claim of Clark v. Clarkstown Police Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Clark v. Clarkstown Police Department, 201 A.D.2d 824, 607 N.Y.S.2d 491, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1129 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed October 14, 1992, which ruled that claimant was jointly employed and awarded workers’ compensation benefits.

Claimant was employed full time as a police officer with the Clarkstown Police Department and part time as a security guard in the parking lot of Singers Caterers. Claimant was injured during his part-time employment when he attempted to stop an altercation inside the catering establishment. We find that claimant, having received the workers’ compensation benefits to which he is entitled under the statute upon his application therefor, is not aggrieved and has no standing before this Court. Were we to consider the merits of his appeal, we would find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that claimant was jointly employed at the time of his injury.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed October 14, 1992, which ruled that claimant was jointly employed and awarded workers’ compensation benefits.

Claimant was employed full time as a police officer with the Clarkstown Police Department and part time as a security guard in the parking lot of Singers Caterers. Claimant was injured during his part-time employment when he attempted to stop an altercation inside the catering establishment. We find that claimant, having received the workers’ compensation benefits to which he is entitled under the statute upon his application therefor, is not aggrieved and has no standing before this Court. Were we to consider the merits of his appeal, we would find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that claimant was jointly employed at the time of his injury.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 A.D.2d 824, 607 N.Y.S.2d 491, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-clark-v-clarkstown-police-department-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack