Claim of Cilio v. Faruolo

239 A.D. 867

This text of 239 A.D. 867 (Claim of Cilio v. Faruolo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Cilio v. Faruolo, 239 A.D. 867 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. (See Fish v. Rutland Railroad Co., 209 App. Div. 303; stipulation by employer and carrier’s attorney.) Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser and Hefíernan, JJ., concur; Bliss, J., dissents and votes to reverse award and to remit claim to the Board.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fish v. Rutland Railroad
209 A.D. 303 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
239 A.D. 867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-cilio-v-faruolo-nyappdiv-1933.