Claim of Cilio v. Faruolo
239 A.D. 867
Opinion
Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. (See Fish v. Rutland Railroad Co., 209 App. Div. 303; stipulation by employer and carrier’s attorney.) Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser and Hefíernan, JJ., concur; Bliss, J., dissents and votes to reverse award and to remit claim to the Board.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Cilio v. Faruolo, 239 A.D. 867 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).
239 A.D. 867 (Claim of Cilio v. Faruolo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fish v. Rutland Railroad
209 A.D. 303 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924)