Claim of Chadwick v. New York Stock Exchange
252 A.D. 714, 299 N.Y.S. 256, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5845
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 29, 1937·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
This case presents the same question involved in the Holst case decided at this term. [See ante, p. 233-] This claimant was injured [715] while playing hockey. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Chadwick v. New York Stock Exchange, 252 A.D. 714, 299 N.Y.S. 256, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5845 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).
252 A.D. 714 (Claim of Chadwick v. New York Stock Exchange) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Claim of Tedesco v. General Electric Co.
276 A.D.2d 422 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1950)