Claim of Centofante v. Belcoo Taxi Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Centofante v. Belcoo Taxi Corp.

38 A.D.2d 983, 329 N.Y.S.2d 313, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5239

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 1, 1972

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 38 A.D.2d 983 (Claim of Centofante v. Belcoo Taxi Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Centofante v. Belcoo Taxi Corp., 38 A.D.2d 983, 329 N.Y.S.2d 313, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5239 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed May 28, 1970. The board’s factual determination that the decedent’s death was not causally related to his employment was supported by substantial evidence in the testimony of respondents’ medical expert. (Matter of Palermo v. Gallucci & Sons, 5 N Y 2d 529.) Furthermore, with respect to appellant’s application for reconsideration there was no abuse of discretion on the part of the board in denying the appellant the right to submit evidence which was known and was previously available to the claimant. (Matter of Aiello v. Rissel Constr. Corp., 37 A D 2d 884.) Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Staley, Jr., Cooke, Sweeney and Simons, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed May 28, 1970. The board’s factual determination that the decedent’s death was not causally related to his employment was supported by substantial evidence in the testimony of respondents’ medical expert. (Matter of Palermo v. Gallucci & Sons, 5 N Y 2d 529.) Furthermore, with respect to appellant’s application for reconsideration there was no abuse of discretion on the part of the board in denying the appellant the right to submit evidence which was known and was previously available to the claimant. (Matter of Aiello v. Rissel Constr. Corp., 37 A D 2d 884.) Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Staley, Jr., Cooke, Sweeney and Simons, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 A.D.2d 983, 329 N.Y.S.2d 313, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-centofante-v-belcoo-taxi-corp-nyappdiv-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack