Claim of Casey v. Howard
This text of 250 A.D. 807 (Claim of Casey v. Howard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal raised the question of coverage. Claimant, an employee of John Howard, was injured while his employer was engaged, pursuant to a subcontract with the general contractors, in fitting a pipe into a hot-water house-heating boiler. The subcontractor carried no workmen’s compensation insurance. The general contractors’ compensation policy covered “ plumbing — gas, steam, hot water or other pipe fitting,” etc. The policy also had attached a rider carrying into the contract the provisions of section 56 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, as to the liability of the general contractor, whose contract includes a hazardous employment, for injuries of the employees of a subcontractor. (See Matter of Passarelli v. Columbia E. & C. Co., 270 N. Y. 68.) The carrier of the general contractor is liable for the award. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to [808]*808the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
250 A.D. 807, 294 N.Y.S. 332, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9073, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-casey-v-howard-nyappdiv-1937.