Claim of Carter v. Gordiner & Warring Co.
194 A.D. 925
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1920·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinions
All concur, except Woodward, J., dissenting, with an opinion, and Cochrane, J., dissenting on the ground that the accident did not arise out of or in the course of employment, under the authority of Matter of Di Salvio v. Menihan Co. (225 N. Y. 123).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Carter v. Gordiner & Warring Co., 194 A.D. 925 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1920).
194 A.D. 925 (Claim of Carter v. Gordiner & Warring Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Turner v. City of New York
249 A.D. 790 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)