Claim of Carter v. Gordiner & Warring Co.
194 A.D. 925
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1920
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 194 A.D. 925 (Claim of Carter v. Gordiner & Warring Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Claim of Carter v. Gordiner & Warring Co., 194 A.D. 925 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1920).
Opinions
All concur, except Woodward, J., dissenting, with an opinion, and Cochrane, J., dissenting on the ground that the accident did not arise out of or in the course of employment, under the authority of Matter of Di Salvio v. Menihan Co. (225 N. Y. 123).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Turner v. City of New York
249 A.D. 790 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
194 A.D. 925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-carter-v-gordiner-warring-co-nyappdiv-1920.