Claim of Cartenuto v. McConnell & Co.

254 A.D. 612, 2 N.Y.S.2d 841
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 16, 1938
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 254 A.D. 612 (Claim of Cartenuto v. McConnell & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Cartenuto v. McConnell & Co., 254 A.D. 612, 2 N.Y.S.2d 841 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

Claimant suffered an industrial injury to his foot; in addition thereto he suffered from osteomyelitis in his foot. The doctors advised amputation of the foot; the claimant has declined to follow their advice. Whether or not this was reasonable was a question of fact to be determined by the State Industrial Board. The injury to the foot wholly incapacitates the claimant, and confines him to his bed. This does not constitute a schedule loss, and may as a matter of fact result in total disability. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ciccone v. National Accessories Stores, Inc.
46 A.D.2d 710 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1974)
Claim of Clara v. Hartsdale Coal Co.
8 A.D.2d 549 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
Claim of Sammis v. Queens Borough Gas & Electric Co.
257 A.D. 58 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 A.D. 612, 2 N.Y.S.2d 841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-cartenuto-v-mcconnell-co-nyappdiv-1938.