Claim of Carley v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Carley v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority

79 A.D.2d 800, 435 N.Y.S.2d 110, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14207

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 24, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 79 A.D.2d 800 (Claim of Carley v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Carley v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority, 79 A.D.2d 800, 435 N.Y.S.2d 110, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14207 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed September 13,1979, which held that claimant’s disability after January 21, 1977 was causally related to an industrial accident sustained by him on January 1, 1977 and that his subsequent treatment at the Veterans Administration Hospital was necessary and authorized. The board found: “based on Dr. Russo’s testimony claimant has a continuing causally related disability subsequent to January 21, 1977, [and] treatment at the Veterans Administration Hospital was necessary and authorized.” Substantial evidence in the record supports this determination of the board. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workers’ Compensation Board. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Main, Mikoll and Casey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed September 13,1979, which held that claimant’s disability after January 21, 1977 was causally related to an industrial accident sustained by him on January 1, 1977 and that his subsequent treatment at the Veterans Administration Hospital was necessary and authorized. The board found: “based on Dr. Russo’s testimony claimant has a continuing causally related disability subsequent to January 21, 1977, [and] treatment at the Veterans Administration Hospital was necessary and authorized.” Substantial evidence in the record supports this determination of the board. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workers’ Compensation Board. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Main, Mikoll and Casey, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

79 A.D.2d 800, 435 N.Y.S.2d 110, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-carley-v-triborough-bridge-tunnel-authority-nyappdiv-1980.