Claim of Campos v. New York Dock Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Campos v. New York Dock Co.

263 A.D. 1031, 33 N.Y.S.2d 538, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7957

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 11, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 263 A.D. 1031 (Claim of Campos v. New York Dock Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Campos v. New York Dock Co., 263 A.D. 1031, 33 N.Y.S.2d 538, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7957 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

This is an appeal by the claimant from a decision of the State Industrial Board reversing and rescinding an award in favor of the claimant. Claimant had several injuries to his left eye, and in this claim he now alleges he was injured in his right eye. Many hearings were had and much evidence was taken and the Industrial Board reversed the award made by a referee and dismissed the claim and found that the condition of claimant’s right eye did not arise out of and in the course of his employment, that there was no causal relation and claimant’s failure to give written notice was not excusable. The evidence supports the decision of the Industrial Board, which should be affirmed. Deesion of the State Industrial Board unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an appeal by the claimant from a decision of the State Industrial Board reversing and rescinding an award in favor of the claimant. Claimant had several injuries to his left eye, and in this claim he now alleges he was injured in his right eye. Many hearings were had and much evidence was taken and the Industrial Board reversed the award made by a referee and dismissed the claim and found that the condition of claimant’s right eye did not arise out of and in the course of his employment, that there was no causal relation and claimant’s failure to give written notice was not excusable. The evidence supports the decision of the Industrial Board, which should be affirmed. Deesion of the State Industrial Board unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Foster, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 A.D. 1031, 33 N.Y.S.2d 538, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-campos-v-new-york-dock-co-nyappdiv-1942.