Claim of Burton v. Mallouk

268 A.D. 935, 51 N.Y.S.2d 131, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4310
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1944·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a decision and award of the State Industrial Board in favor of the claimant and against the employer and insurance carrier. The sole question involved is whether the injuries sustained arose out of and in the course of employment. Appellants contend that claimant was acting solely in his own interest at the time of the accident because the piece of furniture, which he had moved, had been given to him. There is evidence that he had been directed to remove the furniture from a storeroom, and the Board might legitimately infer that he was acting within the scope of Ms employment until the article in question had been completely and safely set at rest. Award affirmed, with cost* to the State Industrial Board. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Burton v. Mallouk, 268 A.D. 935, 51 N.Y.S.2d 131, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4310 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

268 A.D. 935 (Claim of Burton v. Mallouk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Fredrickson v. Ledkote Products Co.
270 A.D. 970 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)