Claim of Burdick v. International Railway Co.
240 A.D. 925
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1933·Published
Opinion
Award reversed and claim dismissed, with costs against the State Industrial Board, on the ground that the decedent was engaged in foreign commerce by railroad. ,Hill, P. J., McNamee and Bliss, JJ., concur; Rhodes and Heffernan, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm the award on the ground that the decedent was not engaged in interstate commerce. (Borelli v. International Ry. Co., 240 N. Y. 54; Illinois Central R. R. Co. v. Behrens, 233 U. S. 473; Chicago, Burlington & Q. R. R. Co. v. Harrington, 241 id. 177.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claim of Burdick v. International Railway Co., 240 A.D. 925 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).
240 A.D. 925 (Claim of Burdick v. International Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Illinois Central Railroad v. Behrens
233 U.S. 473 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Borelli v. International Railway Co.
147 N.E. 356 (New York Court of Appeals, 1925)