Claim of Burdick v. International Railway Co.
This text of 240 A.D. 925 (Claim of Burdick v. International Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Award reversed and claim dismissed, with costs against the State Industrial Board, on the ground that the decedent was engaged in foreign commerce by railroad. ,Hill, P. J., McNamee and Bliss, JJ., concur; Rhodes and Heffernan, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm the award on the ground that the decedent was not engaged in interstate commerce. (Borelli v. International Ry. Co., 240 N. Y. 54; Illinois Central R. R. Co. v. Behrens, 233 U. S. 473; Chicago, Burlington & Q. R. R. Co. v. Harrington, 241 id. 177.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
240 A.D. 925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-burdick-v-international-railway-co-nyappdiv-1933.