Claim of Buckley v. Gallagher Bros. Sand & Gravel Corp.
This text of 92 N.E.2d 38 (Claim of Buckley v. Gallagher Bros. Sand & Gravel Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There was no evidence that claimant became disabled as the result of her duties as a telephone operator. The tuberculosis contracted by her while serving as bookkeeper was not an occupational disease within the meaning of subdivision 2 of section 3 of article 1 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The disease resulted not as an incident to claimant’s occupation but from the fact that she worked alongside a tubercular coemployee who was also a bookkeeper. It was th,e coemployee and not the occupation which caused the disease. (Matter of Harman v. Republic Aviation Corp., 298 N. Y. 285; Matter of Champion v. Gurley, 299 N. Y. 406.)
The order of the Appellate Division and the award of.the Workmen’s Compensation Board should be reversed, with costs
[449]*449in this court and in the Appellate Division, and the claim dismissed.
Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Froessel, JJ., concur.
Ordered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 N.E.2d 38, 300 N.Y. 447, 1950 N.Y. LEXIS 847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-buckley-v-gallagher-bros-sand-gravel-corp-ny-1950.