Claim of Bruno v. City of Niagara Falls

248 A.D. 922, 290 N.Y.S. 237, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8086

This text of 248 A.D. 922 (Claim of Bruno v. City of Niagara Falls) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Bruno v. City of Niagara Falls, 248 A.D. 922, 290 N.Y.S. 237, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8086 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

Appeal by employer from an award of compensation for disability under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The ease was before us on a previous appeal and by our decision (reported at 242 App. Div. 743) it was remitted to the Industrial [923]*923Board to fix the proper rate of compensation. The only question now raised is the rate of compensation. The average weekly wage has now been fixed at nine dollars and twenty cents and the compensation rate at eight dollars. Claimant was a minor working on an emergency work relief project, and was injured on the first day he went to work on this particular job. He received three dollars and twenty cents per day and the employment was for three days a week. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 A.D. 922, 290 N.Y.S. 237, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8086, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-bruno-v-city-of-niagara-falls-nyappdiv-1936.