Claim of Bruno v. City of Niagara Falls

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Bruno v. City of Niagara Falls

248 A.D. 922, 290 N.Y.S. 237, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8086

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Claim of Bruno v. City of Niagara Falls. Read the opinion of the Court — 242 A.D. 743 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 2, 1936·Published

Opinion

Appeal by employer from an award of compensation for disability under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The ease was before us on a previous appeal and by our decision (reported at 242 App. Div. 743) it was remitted to the Industrial [923]*923Board to fix the proper rate of compensation. The only question now raised is the rate of compensation. The average weekly wage has now been fixed at nine dollars and twenty cents and the compensation rate at eight dollars. Claimant was a minor working on an emergency work relief project, and was injured on the first day he went to work on this particular job. He received three dollars and twenty cents per day and the employment was for three days a week. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by employer from an award of compensation for disability under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The ease was before us on a previous appeal and by our decision (reported at 242 App. Div. 743) it was remitted to the Industrial [923]*923Board to fix the proper rate of compensation. The only question now raised is the rate of compensation. The average weekly wage has now been fixed at nine dollars and twenty cents and the compensation rate at eight dollars. Claimant was a minor working on an emergency work relief project, and was injured on the first day he went to work on this particular job. He received three dollars and twenty cents per day and the employment was for three days a week. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ.

Claim of Bruno v. City of Niagara Falls, 248 A.D. 922, 290 N.Y.S. 237, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8086 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

248 A.D. 922 (Claim of Bruno v. City of Niagara Falls) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.