Home/New York Court of Appeals/Claim of Brocklebank v. Union Carbide International Co.

Claim of Brocklebank v. Union Carbide International Co.

195 N.E.2d 313, 13 N.Y.2d 1036
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 21, 1963
StatusPublished

This text of 195 N.E.2d 313 (Claim of Brocklebank v. Union Carbide International Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claim of Brocklebank v. Union Carbide International Co., 195 N.E.2d 313, 13 N.Y.2d 1036 (N.Y. 1963).

Opinion

*1038 Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen’s Compensation Board; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Burke, Foster and Scileppi. Judge Van Voorhis dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the claim upon the ground that there is no substantial evidence that this death arose out of and in the course of decedent’s employment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
195 N.E.2d 313, 13 N.Y.2d 1036, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-brocklebank-v-union-carbide-international-co-ny-1963.