Claim of Boehm v. D. A. Sokol Hall Holding Corp.

274 A.D. 954, 83 N.Y.S.2d 729, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4235
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 17, 1948·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

The alleged employer and its insurance carrier appeal from an award of death benefits made by the Workmen’s Compensation Board [955]*955to the widow of Anton Boehm, deceased. The appeal is based solely on the ground that at the time of the accidental injury there was no relationship of employee and employer between the decedent and alleged employer. Decedent was employed as a casual porter. The accident happened after his regular hours of employment had terminated, but there was proof that he often performed some services after hours and received remuneration therefor by way of refreshments. The board found that such consideration was sufficient to support the relationship of employee and employer. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Poster, Russell and Deyo, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Boehm v. D. A. Sokol Hall Holding Corp., 274 A.D. 954, 83 N.Y.S.2d 729, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4235 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

274 A.D. 954 (Claim of Boehm v. D. A. Sokol Hall Holding Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hill v. King
663 S.W.2d 435 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1983)
Camphill Village, U.S.A., Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Board
243 N.E.2d 739 (New York Court of Appeals, 1968)
Hawksford v. Steinbacher Packing Co.
193 A.2d 163 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1963)
Matter of Kleid v. Carr Bros.
90 N.E.2d 185 (New York Court of Appeals, 1949)