Claim of Boehm v. D. A. Sokol Hall Holding Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Claim of Boehm v. D. A. Sokol Hall Holding Corp.

274 A.D. 954, 83 N.Y.S.2d 729, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4235

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 17, 1948

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 274 A.D. 954 (Claim of Boehm v. D. A. Sokol Hall Holding Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Claim of Boehm v. D. A. Sokol Hall Holding Corp., 274 A.D. 954, 83 N.Y.S.2d 729, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4235 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

The alleged employer and its insurance carrier appeal from an award of death benefits made by the Workmen’s Compensation Board [955]*955to the widow of Anton Boehm, deceased. The appeal is based solely on the ground that at the time of the accidental injury there was no relationship of employee and employer between the decedent and alleged employer. Decedent was employed as a casual porter. The accident happened after his regular hours of employment had terminated, but there was proof that he often performed some services after hours and received remuneration therefor by way of refreshments. The board found that such consideration was sufficient to support the relationship of employee and employer. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Poster, Russell and Deyo, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The alleged employer and its insurance carrier appeal from an award of death benefits made by the Workmen’s Compensation Board [955]*955to the widow of Anton Boehm, deceased. The appeal is based solely on the ground that at the time of the accidental injury there was no relationship of employee and employer between the decedent and alleged employer. Decedent was employed as a casual porter. The accident happened after his regular hours of employment had terminated, but there was proof that he often performed some services after hours and received remuneration therefor by way of refreshments. The board found that such consideration was sufficient to support the relationship of employee and employer. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Poster, Russell and Deyo, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

274 A.D. 954, 83 N.Y.S.2d 729, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claim-of-boehm-v-d-a-sokol-hall-holding-corp-nyappdiv-1948.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack