Claim of Binner v. F. P. Rung Furniture Co.

243 A.D. 843

Opinion

Employee was injured while painting premises owned by the employer. The employer was engaged in the furniture business. The employee was not employed in the conduct of the furniture business, nor in the operation of its stores, nor at their location. The policy of insurance issued by the carrier covered operations of the furniture business solely. Decision unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. (Matter of Anderson v. Abbott-Cheney Paper Corp., 259 N. Y. 26.) Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Claim of Binner v. F. P. Rung Furniture Co., 243 A.D. 843 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

243 A.D. 843 (Claim of Binner v. F. P. Rung Furniture Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Anderson v. Abbott-Cheney Paper Corp.
180 N.E. 883 (New York Court of Appeals, 1932)